National baseline
Start with the travel-distance provisions for business and personal services or mercantile occupancies, then verify whether the floor plan is being checked as a suite, tenant improvement, or larger building condition.
Canadian building code question
Exit travel distance for office and retail occupancies is not one national number. The allowed path depends on the adopted code, whether the use is business/personal services or mercantile, whether the building or suite is sprinklered, and how the exit-access layout is arranged.
This page stays deliberately narrow: office and retail only. It is built to help you frame the travel-distance check before a permit comment or layout revision forces rework, while making it clear that travel distance, common path, dead-end limits, and exit arrangement are related but not interchangeable code questions.
Start with the travel-distance provisions for business and personal services or mercantile occupancies, then verify whether the floor plan is being checked as a suite, tenant improvement, or larger building condition.
Confirm provincial adoption and amendment differences before using a distance limit in design coordination, especially if the project sits in a mixed-use building or a province with a different adopted edition.
Dead ends, common path, remote exit arrangement, and mixed-use building constraints can all complicate what looks like a simple office or retail travel-distance check.
No. They are separate but related egress checks. A layout can appear acceptable on one measure and still fail on the other.
Because the adopted code may allow different travel-distance limits for sprinklered conditions. Assuming the sprinklered path without confirming the project condition can create a false sense of compliance.
No. This page is intentionally limited to office and retail style occupancies. Other occupancies often follow a different travel-distance path and should be checked separately.